{"id":271,"date":"2012-09-01T16:01:51","date_gmt":"2012-09-02T00:01:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/?p=271"},"modified":"2012-09-01T16:33:31","modified_gmt":"2012-09-02T00:33:31","slug":"splitability-for-double-star-observers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/?p=271","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Splitability&#8221; for double-star observers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\">Recently, one of my AstroPlanner users, Wilfried Knapp, posted this message:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\"><em>On the CN DSO forum is a rule of thumb for splitting double stars in discussion: Multiply delta-m (if less than 1 then set 1) with the Dawes limit of your scope to get the minimum separation you need to split this double star under otherwise excellent conditions (seeing etc.).<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\"><em>This rule would be nice if available as wizard or better as option when searching double star catalogues.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\">This seemed like a perfectly useful and easy-to-implement way of rejecting double stars that will not be splittable through a particular telescope, even under perfect conditions. So I decided to integrate it into V2.1.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>This feature is available in four places.<\/p>\n<h2>Object list<\/h2>\n<p>A new &#8220;Split&#8221; column is available. If the object in the list is a double star, has both magnitudes and a separation listed, and a telescope is selected, then the column will contain &#8220;Yes&#8221; if the components are splittable according the above criteria.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\" title=\"20120901a.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/20120901a.png\" alt=\"Object list\" width=\"600\" height=\"275\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In the above example, ADS1, 2, and 5 are all &#8220;splittable&#8221; using the selected 102mm telescope. ADS3 and 4 are not.<\/p>\n<h2>Catalogue display window<\/h2>\n<p>In the catalogue display window, if the catalogue contains any double stars, and the Magnitude, Magnitude2 and Separation fields, then a &#8220;Split&#8221; column is added for the currently selected telescope. Bonus: I also added the Difficulty Index (DI) where that is applicable.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\" title=\"20120901b.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/20120901b.png\" alt=\"Cat display window\" width=\"600\" height=\"170\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n<h2>Plan Creation Wizard<\/h2>\n<p>The Plan Creation Wizard will now use the above &#8220;splitability&#8221; test when selecting suitable double stars. It will use the largest aperture telescope you specify to perform the test. Any chosen doubles will be splittable with that largest telescope.<\/p>\n<h2>Search Catalogue\/s dialog<\/h2>\n<p>When manually searching catalogues using the Search Catalogue\/s feature, the dialog now includes an option to restrict double selection to those splittable by the specified telescope.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\" title=\"20120901c.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/09\/20120901c.png\" alt=\"Search catalogue dialog\" width=\"600\" height=\"393\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently, one of my AstroPlanner users, Wilfried Knapp, posted this message: On the CN DSO forum is a rule of thumb for splitting double stars in discussion: Multiply delta-m (if less than 1 then set 1) with the Dawes limit of your scope to get the minimum separation you need to split this double star [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astroplanner-development"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=271"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":277,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions\/277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}