{"id":138,"date":"2009-10-07T10:10:10","date_gmt":"2009-10-07T18:10:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/?p=138"},"modified":"2009-10-07T10:10:14","modified_gmt":"2009-10-07T18:10:14","slug":"its-been-a-while","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/?p=138","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s been a while&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well it&#8217;s been quite a while since I posted here. Many thousands of man hours have gone by. AstroPlanner in now at V2.0b58. So what is the current status of the application?<!--more-->Well, the application is in reasonably good shape, and I suspect in another release or two&#8217;s time I will start on the final debugging and manual writing phase. By writing and illustrating the manual as I go, I find a lot of cosmetic and other bugs, and often find small overlooked features that need improving or tweaking. As much as I enjoy adding new features, that&#8217;s not going to happen from now on, unless it&#8217;s a &#8220;low hanging fruit&#8221; situation. i.e. something trivially easy to add, without much chance of introducing new bugs or side-effects.<\/p>\n<p>Development has taken a long time, mainly because a lot of internal re-engineering has gone on behind the scenes. As I remarked in earlier posts, V1.x was not in a fit state to be extended beyond its current state. It is\/was slow and used old technologies that are no longer supported. V2 uses as much of the latest technology as I can cram in without breaking my brain. It uses the latest compilers and frameworks, which means if something doesn&#8217;t work in the vendor&#8217;s software, I can lean on them to get it fixed.<\/p>\n<p>Although it&#8217;s not perfect, I (and a lot of the beta testers) believe V2 is a much better product than V1.x. It&#8217;s faster and more scalable (let&#8217;s see how well V1.6 handles a 3,000 object plan), and fixes many (not all) annoyances and shortcomings of V1.<\/p>\n<p>V2.0b59, which should release in a day or so, is looking pretty stable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well it&#8217;s been quite a while since I posted here. Many thousands of man hours have gone by. AstroPlanner in now at V2.0b58. So what is the current status of the application?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-version-2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=138"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":139,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138\/revisions\/139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.astroplanner.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}